I have spent hundreds of hours searching to find The Truth About Vaccines. I have collected studies, news articles, videos, information from our regulatory agencies and big pharma and I have put it all together in one place. I hope to help others learn the truth & explain Why I Won't Vax. Why I Won't Vax Home I Don't Trust Big Pharma Conflicts of Interest No Liability The Vaccine Inserts Inadequate Safety Testing Ingredients The Risks Outweigh The Benefit Unvaxxed are Healthier Decline in Illness Prior to Vaccines Vaccine Failure & Shedding Autism Vaccines Dont Cause Autism Vaccines Do Cause Autism Search Results A few years ago I started to have vaccine safety concerns. Since then, I have spent hundreds of hours searching to find The Truth About Vaccines. I have collected studies, news articles, videos, information from our regulatory agencies and big pharma and I have put it all together in one place. I hope to help others learn the truth & explain Why I Won't Vax. WHY I'M HERE As someone who has worked in the healthcare industry for my entire adult life, I have always believed that vaccines were safe and effective. I received all of my vaccinations and my daughter received all of hers. When I had my son, 13 years later, I started to have questions about the necessity of giving our little ones so many vaccines at such a young age. I wondered if kids really needed to be vaccinated against chicken pox. I had the chicken pox as a child and from what I could remember it seemed to be pretty harmless. I wondered why it was so important for babies to receive a vaccination against Hepatitis B, that we give it to them on their first day of life. I knew that babies weren't at risk of Hepatitis B infection unless their mothers were Hep B positive. I wondered about the necessity of so many vaccines but I never validated these thoughts by asking questions or looking into them further. I believed that there was no way to really find honest answers around the topic of vaccinating, because any information that I would find would be biased one way or the other. So I pushed those questions to the back of my mind and I continued to follow the guidance of my government regulatory agencies and my doctors. When I was pregnant with my son I was given the Rhogam shot called Rhophylac® due to having Rh- blood type. No one ever told me that the warnings on the package insert included things like, “Rhophylac® is made from human plasma. Products made from human plasma may contain infectious agents, e.g., viruses and, theoretically, the Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) agent, that can cause disease” or, “such products can still potentially transmit disease. There is also the possibility that unknown infectious agents may be present in such products” or, “as reported in the literature, some patients treated with Rh0(D) immune globulin (anti-D) developed clinically compromising anemia, acute renal insufficiency, and, very rarely, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and death“. At the same time I was also given a vaccine for Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Pertussis called Boostrix. This vaccine is only authorized for use in people age 10+. To determine the safety in pregnant women there was one study done using the non US formulation of Boostrix. In this study they gave half of the pregnant women Boostrix and half got a saline placebo. AN ACTUAL SALINE PLACEBO! Except once the babies in the placebo group were born they were also given Boostrix (again Boostrix is only authorized for children ages 10 and up). Researchers then compared the outcomes of babies who's mothers received Boostrix while pregnant with the babies who received Boostrix after delivery. Since the outcomes were similar in both groups it was determined Boostrix was safe to give during pregnancy and is now given to every pregnant woman routinely. I did not know this at the time and I did not know to ask. I did not know to read the vaccine insert before allowing myself and my unborn child to be exposed to vaccines. If I would have known I would have saw that right in the 38 page vaccine insert it states side effects such as, “Convulsions (with and without fever), encephalitis, facial palsy, loss of consciousness, paresthesia”. I would have seen that none of the safety studies were ever truly testing Boostrix against an actual placebo. Or that the longest follow up period looking for adverse events was 6 months. If I would have known I might have made a different choice. In fact, if I would have known I absolutely WOULD have made a different choice. My son was born August 8, 2018. Within hours of being born he was vaccinated with the Hepatitis B vaccine. The package insert states that, “In 36 clinical studies, a total of 13,495 doses of ENGERIX-B were administered to 5,071 healthy adults and children who were initially seronegative for hepatitis B markers, and healthy neonates. All subjects were monitored for 4 days post-administration.” They monitored subjects for 4 days. Take a moment to think about that. 4 DAYS. Also, how many of these subjects were born just a few hours before receiving the vaccine? The post marketing surveillance lists side effects such as, “Herpes zoster, meningitis, Encephalitis; encephalopathy; migraine; multiple sclerosis; neuritis; neuropathy including hypoesthesia, paresthesia, Guillain-Barré syndrome and Bell’s palsy; optic neuritis; paralysis; paresis; seizures; syncope; transverse myelitis.“ In a quick review of the FDA licensing documents I was unable to find any real information regarding the safety studies done prior to approval of this vaccine for use in babies on their first day of life. However, I was able to find a study while searching PubMed* that shows boys who are vaccinated with Hepatitis B vaccine within the first month of life have a three fold higher risk of autism than boys who are not vaccinated until after one month. Why in the world would we not wait? Two months later, I received a flu shot. I normally never got the flu shot but this year I did. I was told it was the best way to protect my new baby, by forming a cocoon around him so-to-speak. Once again, had I read the package insert I would have seen that it stated, “It is not known whether Fluzone Quadrivalent is excreted in human milk. Data are not available to assess the effects of Fluzone Quadrivalent on the breastfed infant or on milk production/excretion.The developmental and health benefits of breastfeeding should be considered along with the mother’s clinical need for Fluzone Quadrivalent and any potential adverse effects on the breastfed child from Fluzone Quadrivalent or from the underlying maternal condition. For preventive vaccines, the underlying maternal condition is susceptibility to the disease prevented by the vaccine”. I was never told about any risks or lack of safety studies done on receiving this vaccine while breastfeeding. I was only encouraged to take it. A week later my son received 5 more vaccines. He was seen in urgent care 4 times following that visit and finally diagnosed as failure to thrive by the Emergency Room doctor at Children’s Hospital. A week later, 5 more vaccinations. He stopped eating, stopped sleeping, stopped gaining weight, and screamed non-stop. After that we decided to do a delayed vaccination schedule. Only doing one vaccine at each well-child visit. Our doctor was not supportive of this and we were forced to find a new doctor. After every vaccine he would scream inconsolably for a week. But I continued to get him vaccinated as if there wasn’t another choice. He started to show developmental delays. Despite scoring 109 during a developmental assessment at two months old, well above the cutoff score of 78, he was no longer meeting milestones. A year later he received the same developmental assessment and this time he scored 62. My concerns about my son were validated when he was 19 months old. He was diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder, Global Developmental Delay, and Speech Disorder. I don’t believe that my sons life had to go this way. I believe that we were never informed about the real dangers associated with vaccinating and that if we had not vaccinated he would be healthier today. Vaccinating him is a decision I wish very much that I could take back. I believe that due to my lack of knowledge around vaccines I failed to protect my son and that he faces many struggles today that were unnecessary. I would never tell another parent what decisions to make when it comes to their kids medical care. But I do want parents to have the information before making those decisions. The information is not always biased like I thought. Most of the information I have found comes directly from the manufacturers of the products themselves, or from our regulatory agencies like the CDC and the FDA. The truth is out there you just have to know how to find it. So I decided to put all of the information I have collected into one place that’s easy for people to find and share. That is what this website is. If it helps just one parent feel more informed and empowered to speak up and ask questions about what is being given to their children then it's served it's purpose. Main Issues I Don't Trust Big Pharma Conflicts of Interest The Inserts Inadequate Safety Testing Ingredients Risk Out-Weighs Benefits Decline in Illness Prior to Vaccines Autism No Liability for Injury Covid-19 Vaccines Vaccine Failure & Shedding Other Effective Treatment Opti ons Resources Blog Posts More Stuff I've dedicated countless hours to building this website, pouring every spare minute into it for months. Once I started, I was eager to... May 7, 2023 2 min read 8 0 comments 0 I Wish I Would Have Known Most "anti-vaxxers" weren't always antivax. We are vaxed & we vaxed our kids. It wasnt until our kids were injured that we learned the truth Feb 16, 2023 5 min read 26 0 comments 0 Other Resources Resources for learning the truth about vaccine safety Feb 9, 2023 4 min read 15 0 comments 0 89 Studies on Mercury Peer reviewed published articles linking autism, mercury and thimerosal Jan 30, 2023 1 min read 9 0 comments 0 CDCs ACIP committee voted 15:0 to add the Covid-19 vaccine to the childhood immunization schedule CDCs ACIP committee voted 15:0 to add the Covid-19 vaccine to the childhood immunization schedule starting early 2023. Nov 2, 2022 5 min read 15 0 comments 0 14 ACIP Members Who Voted to Jab Your Young Children — and Their Big Ties to Big Pharma Here is a summary of an article by CHD outlining the conflicts of interest in the ACIP members who approved covid vaccines for kids Oct 22, 2022 6 min read 9 0 comments 0 VIEW ALL BLOG POSTS Do you have questions or comments? I would love to hear your thoughts! G info@WhyIWontVax.com First Name Last Name Email Message Send Thanks for submitting! BACK TO TOP

Everything has some risk. But when it comes to vaccines, we are only told that they are "Safe and Effective".  Even if that is true, there still has to be SOME risks associated with using them.  They can't possibly be the ONLY thing in the world without risks.  What are the risks? Why I Won't Vax Home I Don't Trust Big Pharma Conflicts of Interest No Liability The Vaccine Inserts Inadequate Safety Testing Ingredients The Risks Outweigh The Benefit Unvaxxed are Healthier Decline in Illness Prior to Vaccines Vaccine Failure & Shedding Autism Vaccines Dont Cause Autism Vaccines Do Cause Autism Search Results Risk-Benefit Ratio Nothing in this world comes without some sort of risk. One example is sunlight. It is hugely beneficial for us. It has been shown to lower blood pressure, improve mood and sleep, and it is also enables the body to make Vitamin D. However, too much sunlight along with possible other risk factors can lead to skin cancer. Every thing, regardless of the potential for good, also has the potential for bad. We decide each day which risks we are willing to take in order to receive the benefits that come with it. But when it comes to vaccines, we are only told that they are "Safe and Effective". Even if that is true, there still has to be SOME risks associated with using them. They can't possibly be the ONLY thing in the world without risks. So what are the risks? How severe are they? How common are they? Are some people more prone to risks than others? Do the benefits outweigh the risks???? From The Children's Health Defense Vaccine Injuries Ratio: One for Every 39 Vaccines Administered This article from The Children's Health Defense looks at a 2010 U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) pilot study by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research (AHCR) to test the efficiency of a state-of-the-art machine counting (AI) system on data records from the Harvard Pilgrim HMO and finds vaccine injury occur at a rate of 1 in 39. Read the article here Evidence of Increase in Mortality After the Introduction of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine to Children Aged 6-35 Months in Guinea-Bissau: A Time for Reflection? "Although having better nutritional status and being protected against three infections, 6-35 months old DTP-vaccinated children tended to have higher mortality than DTP-unvaccinated children. All studies of the introduction of DTP have found increased overall mortality" Read More What is VAERS? The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS, is a post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring system used in the United States. VAERS is a passive monitoring system, meaning it relies on on individuals to report adverse events following vaccination. Anyone can make a report to VAERS which can lead to over- or under-reporting. VAERS cannot assess causality between adverse events and receipt of a vaccine and it cannot calculate the incidence or prevalence of an event or determine an increased risk for an event. VAERS can be useful for detecting unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse event reporting that might indicate a possible safety problem with a vaccine. It is the only national surveillance system in place to monitor post marketing safety of vaccines. HOW RELIABLE IS VAERS DATA? In a project funded by HHS, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care collected data from 715,000 patients over a 3 year period. The goal of the project was to "improve the quality of vaccination programs by improving the quality of physician adverse vaccine event detection and reporting to the national Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)". They developed a system that would automate reporting of adverse events based through electronic monitoring of medical records. During this project they also evaluated the performance of the VAERS system. They state in the report that "Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported". Although they were able to develop a way to automate reporting the CDC did not move forward with the program. From the report, "Unfortunately, there was never an opportunity to perform system performance assessments because the necessary CDC contacts were no longer available and the CDC consultants responsible for receiving data were no longer responsive to our multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation. " Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS) Evidence of Serious Adverse Events in What Is Believed to Be One of the Most Effective Vaccines (Part 1) The Truth About HPV Vaccines: Part I Link to full article Concerns of Increased Neurological and Autoimmune Events After HPV Vaccines: Large Studies (Part 2) The Truth About HPV Vaccines: Part II Link to full article Vaxxed vs Un-Vaxxed Who has better health outcomes overall? See The Vaxxed vs Un-Vaxxed Studies Kids Are Sicker Than Ever Chronic illness in kids has hit an all time high. See The Numbers Adverse Events & Risks Associated With Vaccination Spontaneous Abortion Adverse event reports after tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccines in pregnant women View Study Eczema Vaccinatum Eczema vaccinatum resulting from the transmission of vaccinia virus from a smallpox vaccinee: an investigation of potential fomites in the home environment View Study Fibromyalgia Fibromyalgia, infection and vaccination: two more parts in the etiological puzzle View Study Bells Palsy Safety of Quadrivalent Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine in 11- to 21-Year-Olds View Study Eczema Vaccinatum Severe eczema vaccinatum in a household contact of a smallpox vaccinee View Study Hearing Loss Reports of sensorineural deafness after measles, mumps, and rubella immunisation View Study Cardiorespiratory Events Adverse events following vaccination in premature infants View Study Bell's palsy, Paraesthesia, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Neurological and autoimmune disorders after vaccination against pandemic influenza A (H1N1) with a monovalent adjuvanted vaccine: population based cohort study in Stockholm, Sweden View Study Vaccinia How Contagious Is Vaccinia? View Study Hearing Loss Live attenuated measles and mumps viral strain-containing vaccines and hearing loss: Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), United States, 1990--2003 View Study Myopericarditis Acute myopericarditis after multiple vaccinations in an adolescent: case report and review of the literature View Study Autism Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism? View Study Load More BACK TO TOP Home Page Unvaxxed Are Healthier

By removing liability through NVICP & PREP Act, then making products mandatory we have created a very lucrative business model for vaccine makers.  There is no longer an incentive for manufacturers to invest in making their products safe. Why I Won't Vax Home I Don't Trust Big Pharma Conflicts of Interest No Liability The Vaccine Inserts Inadequate Safety Testing Ingredients The Risks Outweigh The Benefit Unvaxxed are Healthier Decline in Illness Prior to Vaccines Vaccine Failure & Shedding Autism Vaccines Dont Cause Autism Vaccines Do Cause Autism Search Results There Is No Liability For Injuries. With most products on the market consumers have the ability to bring litigation against the manufacturer if that product causes injuries. If your seatbelt is faulty and you are injured in a crash because of it, you can sue the car manufacturer for those injuries This is true for any of the products that we as consumers buy and use. Despite Bidens claim that gun manufacturers are the only industry in America that can't be sued , even they can and have been sued. According to an article in Forbes, "Plaintiffs do not need to prove that the defendant acted negligently or intentionally in product liability cases. That’s because a legal doctrine called “strict liability” applies in these types of claims. Under strict liability rules, plaintiffs can prove their case and prevail in court if they simply show that the problem with the product was the direct cause of unexpected harm." In the medical industry you can sue if you are injured due to physician negligence, or faulty medical devices . For example, thousands of lawsuits have been filed against manufacturers who made metal on metal hip replacements . More than $7 Billion has been paid out in settlements for these lawsuits. If you are injured due to taking a medication you can sue the pharmacuetical companies. Currently there are over 13,000 open lawsuits in New Jersey for those injured by proton pump inhibiters such as prilosec. Claims allege that companies failed to warn consumers about the drugs potential risks of kidney failure, kidney disease , and other injuries . Having the ability to file a lawsuit for injuries is important for a number of reasons. The thing that usually comes to mind for people is the financial compensation that those who are injured may need for medical bills, missed work, and compensation for pain and suffering. Another important part of litigation is that it creates a system in which manufacturers must search for and produce products that are safe for their own survival. It gives them an incentive to invest into the safety of their products or face litigation that could potentially bankrupt the company. The incentive to invest money into safety is reduced greatly when a company understands that they do not have to be accountable for damages. However, a company may still consider safety testing important if they want consumers to purchase their products. With vaccines, consumers are required to take this product to enter schools and daycares. Often they must continue to get vaccines as adults to work in certain career fields. By removing liability and then making the products mandatory for every person in the country we have created an extremely lucrative business model for manufacturers. There is no longer an incentive for manufacturers to invest in making their products safe. Why Is There No Liability For Vaccine Manufactureres? The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) was establised by congress in 1986 as a no-fault alternative to the traditional legal system. Prior to this there were concerns that potential liablity for injuries caused by vaccines threatened the vaccination program and acted as a deterrant to vaccine manufacturing. The United States was facing a vaccine shortage that was thought to threaten public health. These concerns led to the establishment of The Committee on Public-Private Sector Relations in Vaccine Innovation by the Institute of Medicine in 1983. The committee was asked to do a comprehensive study of vaccine research and development, production and supply, and utilization. Their report and reccommendations were published in 1985. You can find that full report HERE. In their report they state that, "A manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by a nondefective product due to its inherent or unavoidable dangerousness . Thus, if a properly manufactured vaccine will cause harmful side effects in some portion of the recipient population, the manufacturer of the vaccine is not liable for those side effects." They go on to state that some products are " Unavoidably unsafe products. There are some products which, in the present state of human knowledge, are quite incapable of being made safe for their intended and ordinary use. " The report notes that those injured by vaccines should recieve compensation and that the traditional legal system can be complex, expensive and time consuming. Therefore, the committee recommends the development of a compensation program where claims should be processed without regard to "fault". They recommend the establishment of a schedule of events for which scientific evidence indicates a plausible association with vaccination. The goal of the NVICP was to encourage investment in vaccine development and manufacturing and to compensate those who are injured in a timely mannor. The program seems to have been effective at encouraging vaccine development. With the threat of liability off the table the vaccination program has exploded. In 1986 children recieved 12 doses of 8 vaccines. In 2023 we are up to 58 doses of 18 vaccines from birth-18 years, plus 2 injections for 4 vaccines in-utero. This chart from Children's Health Defense shows vaccine schedules from 1986 compared to 2019. We have since added 3 doses of Covid-19 vaccinations to the schedule. However, the program has not been as successful when it comes to making sure those who are injured are compensated for their injuries. The program has a table of covered vaccines and injuries that will qualify for compensation if they fall within a certain time frame of being vaccinated. For injuries that are not listed on the table the burden of proof lies with the petitioner. The program also has a very strict time limit of 3 years from the time of injury to file a claim. Since 1988 there have been 25,961 claims filed and 9,664 of those were compensated. Considering there have been 2,439,553 reports of injury to VAERS following vaccination , and that a report by Harvard Pilgrim Health noted, "fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported" to VAERS , there seems to be a very small number of individuals with injuries actually filing a claim with the NVICP. (See What Is VAERS?) The program has also not been a timely process for petitioners. A report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office looked at the data for claims filed between 1999-2014 and found that most claims took multiple years to process. View More "Every year, a number of children are seriously injured by adverse reactions to vaccines. When such a tragedy befalls a family, they are faced with devastating emotional and financial consequences. As the devastation of adverse reactions can lead to paralysis, permanent disability and death, families without adequate insurance can face enormous expenses, including residential care, therapy, medical equipment, and drugs." -COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM, SIXTH REPORT Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREPA) The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (Prep Act or PREPA) was enacted by Congress in 2005. Health & Human Services describes the PREP Act on their website , "The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (Secretary) to issue a PREP Act declaration. The declaration provides immunity from liability (except for willful misconduct) for claims: of loss caused, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from administration or use of countermeasures to diseases, threats and conditions determined by the Secretary to constitute a present, or credible risk of a future public health emergency to entities and individuals involved in the development, manufacture, testing, distribution, administration, and use of such countermeasures A PREP Act declaration is specifically for the purpose of providing immunity from liability, and is different from, and not dependent on, other emergency declarations." Immunity means that courts must dismiss claims brought against any entity or individual covered by the PREP Act. Claims that courts must dismiss include claims for any loss that is related to any stage of design, development, testing, manufacture, labeling, distribution, formulation, labeling, packaging, marketing, promotion, sale, purchase, donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration, licensing or use of a countermeasure recommended in a Declaration. This includes, but is not limited to, claims for: death; physical, mental, or emotional injury, illness, disability, or condition or fear of any such injury, illness, disability, or condition; any need for medical monitoring; or property damage or loss, including business interruption loss. The only exception is for claims of willful misconduct. From the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services A Declaration may provide liability immunity for covered persons. Covered persons may include, at the Secretary’s discretion: Manufacturers of countermeasures; Distributors of countermeasures; Program planners , i.e., individuals and entities involved in planning, administering, or supervising programs for distribution of a countermeasure (e.g., State or local governments, Indian tribes, or private sector employers or community groups that establish requirements or provide guidance, technical or scientific advice or assistance, or provide a facility); Qualified persons, i.e., persons who prescribe, administer, or dispense countermeasures such as healthcare and other providers or other categories of persons named in a Declaration, e.g., volunteers; Officials, agents, and employees of any of these entities or persons; and The United States. A “covered countermeasure” may be: A qualified pandemic or epidemic product ; A security countermeasure ; An unapproved drug , biological product , or device used under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) issued by FDA; An approved drug , biological product , or device used pursuant to Federal law in conditions that are in consistent with its approval ; or An unapproved drug , biological product , or device , or an approved drug, biological product , or device intended for an unapproved use, that is intended for emergency use and shipped and held by a government agency or someone working on that agency’s behalf for use only when that use is authorized. The PREP Act states that those who are seriously injured, described as an injury that warranted hospitalization (whether or not the person was actually hospitalized) or that led to a significant loss of function or disability, by a declared countermeasure may file a claim with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) within one year of the injury. " If no funds have been appropriated to the compensation program, or the Secretary does not make a final determination on the individual’s request within 240 days, or the individual decides not to accept the compensation, the injured individual or his representative may pursue a tort claim in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, but only if the claim involves willful misconduct and meets the other requirements for suit under the PREP Act . If the individual accepts compensation from the CICP, or if there is no willful misconduct, the individual does not have a tort claim that can be filed in a United States Federal or a State court. Any award is reduced by public or private insurance or worker’s compensation available to the injured individual. Awards for non-economic damages, such as pain, suffering, physical impairment, mental anguish, and loss of consortium are also limited ." CICP may compensate for medical expenses, lost employment income, and survivors benefits. However, it is a last resort and will only pay for expenses that are not compensated by other means such as health insurance and workmans comp. Unlike the NVICP, the CICP will not cover lawyer fees. Since 2010 there have been only 30 claims compensated through the CICP CICP Data for Fiscal Years 2010 – 2023 (As of March 1, 2023) Total CICP Claims Filed: 11,765 Pending Review or In Review: 10,629 Decisions: 1,136 Claims Found Eligible for Compensation: 61 Claims Compensated: 30 Claims Pending Benefits Determination: 21 Claims with No Eligible Reported Expenses: 10 Denied: 1,075 Requested Medical Records Not Submitted: 182 Standard of Proof Not Met and/or Covered Injury Not Sustained: 324 Missed Filing Deadline: 248 Not CICP Covered Product/Not Specified: 321 There Is Also No Mandated Reporting For Injuries In a research project conducted by Harvard Pilgrem Health over a span of three years and funded by a grant from Health and Human Services, it was noted that "fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. " The team at Harvard Pilgrem Health developed a way to electronically monitor medical records and notify physticians of possible adverse events following reciept of vaccinations. This would prompt the physician to review the records and submit the event to the VAERS system, along with any optional notes or to note in the record reasons for not submitting to VAERS. The team concludes that after three years of collecting data and development of the automated system they were unable to move forward with implementing the program, "Unfortunately, there was never an opportunity to perform system performance assessments because the necessary CDC contacts were no longer available and the CDC consultants responsible for receiving data were no longer responsive to our multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation." More information can be found HERE One report describes VAERS as a spontaneous surveillance system and explains, " Spontaneous surveillance means that no active effort is made to search for, identify and collect information, but rather information is passively received from those who choose to voluntarily report their experience. Therefore, VAERS relies on the intuition and experience of healthcare professionals in particular, but likewise for patients, parents and caregivers, to recognize and report unusual or unexpected events following vaccination or suspected vaccine safety problems. " This same report notes that, "During 2011-2014, VAERS averaged around 30,000 U.S. reports annually, with 7% classified as serious." If VAERS is only representiong 1% of adverse events that would mean the number of actual adverse events during that 3 year period was closer to 3,000,000 annually with about 210,000 a year being serious. Some might say that is a small number compared to the number of vaccine doses administered each year, but when its your child who is injured the number isn't small at all. Another important point to consider is "Vaccines are generally given to healthy individuals to prevent disease, whereas drugs are primarily given for treatment of illness. Sick patients, or parents of sick children, might be more willing to accept safety risks of drugs used to treat illnesses compared to vaccines used to prevent possible future illnesses." 210,000 serious injuries a year starts to seem like a lot when you consider many of these injuries happened in perfectly healthy children. Looking back on our own personal experience my son was seen in urgent care 3 times in the 30 days following his first round of vaccines. None of these visits were reported to VAERS. Not one of the doctors, nurses, or other medical professionals (such as those at the WIC office or our public healt h nurse who came out to visit us weekly) ever mentioned that vaccines could have been related to the issues we were having. Sadly, I was unaware that it was even possible for vaccines to cause these problems. Then dealing with a sick baby who would not eat or sleep and screamed non-stop, I was sleep deprived and stressed out and not able to see clearly the connection that is so obvious to me when looking back. Whether is was caused by the vaccine or not those urgent care visits should have been reported to VAERS so that it could be used to look for signals. If there are a high number of urgent care visits with similar complaints following the same vaccinations that would raise a flag for our regulatory agencies to look at it further. If things are not reported then they can't find possible connections. Home Page BACK TO TOP The Vaccine Inserts

The CDC states that, "Vaccines do not cause autism."  What evidence do they use to make that claim?  It goes on further to state that, "Some people have had concerns that ASD might be linked to the vaccines children receive, but studies have shown that there is no link between receiving vaccines and developing ASD." Why I Won't Vax Home I Don't Trust Big Pharma Conflicts of Interest No Liability The Vaccine Inserts Inadequate Safety Testing Ingredients The Risks Outweigh The Benefit Unvaxxed are Healthier Decline in Illness Prior to Vaccines Vaccine Failure & Shedding Autism Vaccines Dont Cause Autism Vaccines Do Cause Autism Search Results <<< Back To Autism Vaccines Do Cause Autism >>> What Evidence Is Used To Conclude That Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism? The CDC website states that, "Vaccines do not cause autism." What evidence do they use to make that claim? It goes on further to state that, "Some people have had concerns that ASD might be linked to the vaccines children receive, but studies have shown that there is no link between receiving vaccines and developing ASD. The National Academy of Medicine, formerly known as Institute of Medicine, reviewed the safety of 8 vaccines to children and adults. The review found that with rare exceptions, these vaccines are very safe." I have linked the report from the IOM below. Using the search tool at the top of the report I did a search for the word "autism" which made it easy to find each instance autism is referenced in the report. Quickly I could see that the statement made by the CDC was deceptive and misleading . Again, the statement made by the CDC is that the IOM reviewed the safety of 8 vaccines . However, the IOM only looked at the evidence available for two vaccines in relationship to autism. The committee reviewed 22 studies to evaluate the risk of autism after the administration of MMR vaccine . Twelve studies were not considered due to passive surveillance data used in the studies. Six studies were not considered due to "very serious methodological limitations". Based on the FOUR remaining studies IOM determined "The evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship between MMR vaccine and autism ". The IOM also looked at a possible relationship to DTaP vaccines and autism. The committee reviewed ONE study to evaluate the risk and the study "was not considered in the weight of epidemiologic evidence because it provided data from a passive surveillance system and lacked an unvaccinated comparison population." The IOM concluded that, "The epidemiologic evidence is insufficient or absent to assess an association between diphtheria toxoid–, tetanus toxoid–, or acellular pertussis–containing vaccine and autism." Further misleading the CDC stated that according to this review, "with rare exceptions, these vaccines are very safe" . When in fact the IOM reviewed available literature for 158 of the most common injuries thought to be related to vaccination, in which they found the science “ convincingly supports a causal relationship ” for 14 of these serious injuries , including pneumonia, meningitis, hepatitis, MIBE (deadly brain inflammation a year after vaccination), febrile seizures, and anaphylaxis. The review found sufficient evidence to support “acceptance of a causal relationship” for 4 additional serious injuries . The IOM was unable to find sufficient evidence to conclude or deny the relationship of 135 other serious injuries. Institute of Medicine Report The second reference used by CDC to support their claim that VACCINES DO NOT CAUSE AUTISM is a CDC study published in 2013 that focused on the number of antigens received during the first two years of life. They concluded that, " increasing exposure to antibody-stimulating proteins and polysaccharides in vaccines during the first 2 years of life was not related to the risk of developing an ASD. " This study in no way evaluates whether VACCINES cause autism. They don't look at how many vaccines each child received or which vaccines. Antigens have never thought to have been the issue in regards to autism and vaccines. Using this study on their website as proof that VACCINES do not cause autism is an insult to our intellegence. It also shows the CDCs overall lack of concern about children and families who are impacted by autism. If they wanted to prove that vaccines do not cause autism once and for all they would use the data they already have on millions of Americans and they would compare the rates of autism in the vaccinated against the rates in the un-vaccinated. They refuse to do this study, and have gone a step further by moving these records into a private company making it impossible for anyone else to access these records. Why? If they truly believe that VACCINES do not cause autism, why not do the study on vaccinated vs completely unvaccinated and end the debate once and for all??? I am not able to say the intentions of others but it certainly feels like they actually don't truly believe vaccines do not cause autism. It seems as though they care more about protecting the vaccine program and pharma profits, than they do about 1 in 44 kids who are having their chance at a normal life stolen from them. CDC Study on Autism & Antigens These are the only studies referenced on the CDC website in support of the claim that VACCINES DO NOT CAUSE AUTISM. They only reference TWO vaccines. One of which, DTaP, the report could neither acce pt OR deny a relationship between the vaccine and autism. THIS IS PATHETIC. But lets see what else they have to say. CDC goes on to state that, " vaccine ingredients do not cause autism". Lets look at the research they have used to support that statement. The first reference they use to support that claim is a 2004 scientific review by the IOM that concluded “the evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship between thimerosal–containing vaccines and autism.” In the review the IOM describes the five studies used to make that conclusion. 1. Hviid et al., 2003; Association between thimerosal-containing vaccine and autism Compared autism rates in those who received vaccines containing thimerosal with those that received thimerosal free vaccines. The mean age of diagnosis was 4.7 years old. However, the study included cases and controls as young as 1 years old . Meaning many of the subjects would later go on to receive an autism diagnosis . Also, instead of counting "persons" the authors counted "person-years of follow-up" meaning each age group was considered equially despite the fact that younger age groups were much less likely to have been diagnosed with autism as those in older groups. 2. Miller, 2004; Thimerosal exposure in infants and developmental disorders: a retrospective cohort study in the United kingdom does not support a causal association A retrospective cohort study completed using records from a database in the United Kingdom, where autism prevalence rates were compared for children receiving Thimerosal-containing DTaP and DT vaccines. Numerous statistical errors by correlating thimerosal exposure with year of birth. The authors of this study never released the raw data so that a valid single-variable analysis could be conducted to ascertain the probability of an association between Thimerosal exposure and the risk of autism. Also important is that the amount of thimerosal exposure in the UK was not comparable to that in the United States where children were getting larger exposures during younger periords of life. 3. Verstraeten et al., 2003 Safety of thimerosal-containing vaccines: a two-phased study of computerized health maintenance organization databases A cohert analysis of records from the Vaccine Safety Datalink done by the CDC. This study had at least 5 phases. Results from the first phase showed that infants who were exposed to greater than 25𝜇g of Hg in vaccines and immunoglobulins at the age of one month were 7.6 times more likely to have autism diagnosis than those not exposed to any vaccine-derived organic Hg. The second phase they compared exposure from 3 months old instead of one month and found that children exposed to the maximum amount of organic Hg in infant vaccines (62.5𝜇g) were 2.48 times more likely to have autism diagnosis compared to those exposed to less than 37.5𝜇gof Hg in vaccines. The third phase used different inclusion/exclusion criteria stratisfying the data the relative risk of autism for children at three months of Thimerosal exposure dropped to 1.69. The fourth and fifth phase of the study used records from only two of the original HMOs and incorporated a third HMO, Harvard Pilgrim, into the analysis. The HMO used different diagnostic codes and in this study they included children from 0-3 years old even though the average age of autism diagnosis was 4.4 years. There was a lot of contraversy around the Verstraeten study. Emails obtained through FOIA requests show that Verstraeten was receiving pressure from the CDC to use methods to deny a casual relationship between thimerosal and autism. 4. Madsen et al., 2003; Thimerosal and the occurrence of autism: negative ecological evidence from Danish population-based data CDC sponsored study that looked at whether discontinuing the use of thimerosal in vaccines in Denmark lead to a decreased rate of autism. The study examined the data from 1971 to 2000 and reported that rate of autism increased with the removal of Thimerosal from vaccines starting in 1992. However, autism rates only included those who were diagnosed in an inpatient setting from 1971-1994. In 1995 the inclusion of those diagnosed in an outpatient setting were added . The authors state that the outpatient setting had 4-6x that of the inpatient . In a previous publication the same authors using the same data reported 93.1% of children were treated only as outpatients. The inclusion of the outpatient population would explain why the numbers of autism cases continued to rise after phase out of thimerosal. Also inflating the numbers was the inclusion of a large clinic in the dataset starting in 1993. This clinic accounted for as many as 20% of a utism patients nationwide. Last, the diagnostic criteria for autism changed in 1994 resulting in an increased incidence by up to 25x what it was using previous diagnostic criteria . 5. Stehr-Green et al., 2003; Autis m and thimerosal-containing vaccines: lack of consistent evidence for an association Compared the prevalence/incidence of autism in California, Sweden, and Denmark with average exposures to thimerosal containing vaccines. This study used the same data from Denmark as the previous study. There was an artificial increase in autism rates by 20x following removal of thimerosal due to inclusion of outpatients starting in 1995 , the inclusion of a large clinic accounting for 20% of cases in 1993, change in diagnostic criteria in 1994. This study also used data from Sweden but looked at only inpatient cases of autism counting only a small portion of the actual cases of autism. Also, children in Sweden received a maximum 75 micrograms of Hg by age two. Children in California received up to 237.5 micrograms of Hg by 18 months. T his same report by the Institute of Medicine also states that, "Absent biomarkers, well-defined risk factors, or large effect sizes, THE COMMITTEE CANNOT RULE OUT , based on the epidemiological evidence, the possibility that vaccines contribute to autism in some small subset or very unusual circumstances." Your can veiw the IOM report H ER E . Read more about the flawed methods and manipulation of data- Methodological Issues and Evidence of Malfeasance in Research Purporting to Show Thimerosal in Vaccines Is Safe Study Misses Link Between Thimerosal and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Letter to the Editor M. Geier , D. Geier; Published 2004; Medicine Summarized conflict of interest issues, manipulated data, and suppression of initial findings in the Verstraeten study. Read It Here "Since 2003, there have been nine CDC-funded or conducted studies that have found no link between thimerosal-containing vaccines and ASD. These studies also found no link between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and ASD in children." 1 Thimerosal exposure in early life and neuropsychological outcomes 7-10 years late Ֆ Barile JP, Kuperminc GP, Weintraub ES, Mink JW, Thompson WW Conflicts & Issues- Overmatching phenomena meant that cases and controls had very little difference in thimerosal exposure. More Info 2 Prenatal and Infant Exposure to Thimerosal From Vaccines and Immunoglobulins and Risk of Autism Price CS, Thompson WW, Goodson B, Weintraub ES, Croen LA, et al. Conflicts & Issues: Overmatching phenomena meant that cases and controls had very little difference in thimerosal exposure. Prenatal thimerosal effect was hidden by cherry-picking data. More Info 3 Neuropsychological Performance 10 Years After Immunization in Infancy With Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines Tozzi AE, Bisiacchi P, Tarantino V, De Mei B, D’Elia L, et al. Conflicts & Issues: Study was completed using Italian vaccine schedule with much lower thimerosal exposure than U.S. schedule. No zero exposure control was use. More Info 4 Thimerosal-containing vaccines: evidence versus public apprehension DeStefano F. Destefano relied on flawed epidemiology studies from the U.K. and Denmark which follow different vaccination schedules compared to the U.S. Data from California show clear correlation between thimerosal uptake and autism incidence. More Info 5 Inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) in children <2 years of age: Examination of selected adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) after thimerosalfree or thimerosalcontaining vaccine McMahon AW, Iskander JK, Haber P, Braun MM, Ball R. The definition of an adverse event was limited to site reactions and fever. No data were collected regarding any type of neurological outcome. More Info 6 Early Thimerosal Exposure and Neuropsychological Outcomes at 7 to 10 Years Thompson WW, Price C, Goodson B, Shay DK, Benson P, et al Overmatching phenomena meant that cases and controls had very little difference in thimerosal exposure. More Info 7 Safety of Thimerosalcontaining vaccines: a two-phased study of computerized health maintenance organization databases Verstraeten T, Davis RL, DeStefano F, Lieu TA, Rhodes PH, et al Effects were diluted through five separate iterations of the study. Numerous exclusion criteria were erroneously applied and data cherry-picking was done to dilute statistically significant effects. More Info 8 Autism and thimerosalcontaining vaccines: lack of consistent evidence for an association Stehr-Green P, Tull P, Stellfeld M, Mortenson PB, Simpson D. Wrongfully dismissed autism rates in California as inclusion of milder ASD cases to obviate the rise in cases. More Info 9 Autism and thimerosalcontaining vaccines: lack of consistent evidence for an association Stehr-Green P, Tull P, Stellfeld M, Mortenson PB, Simpson D There was an artificial increase in autism rates by 20x following removal of thimerosal due to inclusion of outpatients starting in 1995 , the inclusion of a large clinic accounting for 20% of cases in 1993, change in diagnostic criteria in 1994 . More Info BACK TO TOP

A compilation of documents and articles showing conflicts of interest between pharmaceutical companies and the media, our educational institutions, and our government regulatory agencies. Why I Won't Vax Home I Don't Trust Big Pharma Conflicts of Interest No Liability The Vaccine Inserts Inadequate Safety Testing Ingredients The Risks Outweigh The Benefit Unvaxxed are Healthier Decline in Illness Prior to Vaccines Vaccine Failure & Shedding Autism Vaccines Dont Cause Autism Vaccines Do Cause Autism Search Results Conflicts of Interest A compilation of documents and articles showing conflicts of interest between pharmaceutical companies and the media, our educational institutions, and our government regulatory agencies Media In 2020 75% of TV ad spending came from Pharma. Click here to learn more. Research & Medical Institutions Pharmaceutical and medical device company contributions accounted for 28% of continuing medical education (CME) funding in 2017. Click here to learn more. Government & Regulatory Agencies Industry fees account for $2.9 billion of the FDA's $6.5 billion a year budget. Big Pharma Owns The Corporate Media, But Americans Are Waking Up And Fighting Back When you tune in to MSNBC, Fox News, or any of the other corporate media machines, you’re probably not going to hear much about the methods in which big pharma is taking advantage of consumers either through price gouging or medical mishaps. The reason for this is because talking about those stories creates a major conflict of interest for the people behind the scenes. Mike Papantonio discusses this with journalist and author Martha Rosenberg. DRUG INDUSTRY MONEY QUIETLY BACKS MEDIA VOICES AGAINST SHARING VACCINE PATENTS Doctors, economists, lawmakers, and civil society groups fighting the WTO waiver are funded by the pharmaceutical lobby Big Pharma Lobbied Social Media to Flag COVID ‘Misinformation,’ Latest ‘Twitter Files’ Reveal COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers, including Pfizer, BioNTech and Moderna, lobbied Twitter and other social media platforms to set moderation rules that would flag purported COVID-19-related “misinformation,” according to Lee Fang, who reported on the latest “Twitter files.” Yes, Fauci and Gates Do Have Ties to COVID-19 Vaccine Maker A USA Today headline falsely claiming Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates have “no ties” to Moderna is illustrative of a major problem with our media. Breaking: Landmark Lawsuit Slaps Legacy Media With Antitrust, First Amendment Claims for Censoring COVID-Related Content A lawsuit filed today by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and multiple other plaintiffs, alleges the Trusted News Initiative, a self-described “industry partnership” launched in March 2020 by several of the world’s largest news organizations, partnered with Big Tech firms to collectively censor online news. Conflicts of interest in health care journalism. Who’s watching the watchdogs? Ben Harder, a journalist with "US News & World Report," recently tweeted, “Pharma ads subsidize many health reporters’ salaries. Inside the Facebook Files: Emails Reveal the CDC's Role in Silencing COVID-19 Dissent Throughout the pandemic, the CDC was in constant contact with Facebook, vetting what users were allowed to say on the social media site. Financial ties of principal investigators and randomized controlled trial outcomes: cross sectional study To examine the association between the presence of individual principal investigators’ financial ties to the manufacturer of the study drug and the trial’s outcomes after accounting for source of research funding. Stanford launches major effort to expedite vaccine discovery with $50 million grant The funding will establish the Stanford Human Systems Immunology Center, and will accelerate efforts to develop vaccines for the world's most deadly infectious diseases. Rockefeller Foundation, Nonprofits Spending Millions on Behavioral Psychology Research to ‘Nudge’ More People to Get COVID Vaccines The Rockefeller Foundation, the National Science Foundation and other nonprofits are pouring millions of dollars into a research initiative “to increase uptake of COVID-19 vaccines and other recommended public health measures by countering mis- and disinformation.” By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D. Big Pharma Pays Universities for Most Medical Research in U.S. Today More than half of medical research funding in the U.S now comes from pharmaceutical companies, which exceeds funding of research by the National Institutes of Health. University of Washington To accelerate globally-informed and pregnancy-specific modeling to support drug development for maternal health Harvard Medical Students Rebel Against Pharma-Ties 200 Harvard Medical School STUDENTS are confronting the administration demanding an end to pharmaceutical industry influence in the classroom. Microsoft partners with the University of Washington to create the Tech Policy Lab 1 FDA receives 45% of its annual budget from industry More Info 2 The World Health Organization (WHO) gets half its budget from private sources, Pharma and its allied foundations More Info 3 CDC, is a vaccine company that owns 56 vaccine patents More Info CDC buys and distributes $4.6 billion in vaccines annually - Vaccines for Children program… over 40% of its total budget More Info 4 Pfizer Board – FDA Connection CDC Urged to Be Truthful About Its Corporate Financial Ties Public interest nonprofit organizations U.S. Right to Know and Public Citizen have petitioned the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to stop issuing false disclaimers that it “does not accept commercial support” and has “no financial interests or other relationships with the manufacturers of commercial products.”1 Gates Foundation Donations to WHO Nearly Match Those From U.S. Government President Donald Trump announced Friday that the U.S. would be ‘terminating’ its relationship with the World Health Organization. Trump’s FDA commissioner takes job at Moderna backer Stephen Hahn joins Flagship Pioneering, which launched Moderna a decade ago and made billions from its coronavirus vaccine Big Pharma’s Takeover of Modern Medicine Created a ‘Pandemic of Misinformed Doctors’ Cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra shares data on the Big Pharma takeover of modern medicine and explains how it’s led to “a pandemic” of misinformed doctors who unwittingly harm and misinform their patients. 14 ACIP Members Who Voted to Jab Your Young Children — and Their Big Ties to Big Pharma On Nov. 2, members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s vaccine advisory committee voted 14–0 to recommend Pfizer’s pediatric COVID shot for children 5 –11 years old. Were their decisions driven by science and conscience — or their ties to drugmakers? Hidden conflicts? Pharma payments to FDA advisers after drug approvals spark ethical concerns Science investigation of journal disclosures and pharmaceutical funding records shows potential influence on physician gatekeepers Thanks to Pfizer Vaccine, 3rd-Party Royalties to NIH Doubled to $127 Million in 2021 Adam Andrzejewski, founder of OpenTheBooks.com, told comedian and political commentator Russell Brand that 3,000 pages of documents produced by the National Institutes of Health were so heavily redacted that if “we didn't employ forensic data scientists these disclosures would have been absolutely worthless.” Committee that recommends vaccines for CDC schedule voting on COVID, other shots Statement from NIH and BARDA on the FDA Emergency Use Authorization of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Pharma funded more than 2,400 state lawmaker campaigns in 2020, new STAT analysis finds Major pharmaceutical companies and trade groups helped fund the campaigns of more than 2,400 state legislators nationwide in the 2020 election. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Announces $750 Million Gift to Speed Delivery of Life-Saving Vaccines SEATTLE -- The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced today a gift of $750 million over five years to help ensure that children in developing countries are immunized against major killer diseases in the new millennium Conflicts of Interest as a Health Policy Problem: Industry Ties and Bias in Drug Approval Home Page BACK TO TOP No Liability

Most of us have heard that vaccines are one of the greatest medical advancements of modern history.  It has been touted that vaccines have prevented more deaths in the last 50 years than any other advancement.  Where does this information come from? More importantly, is it true?  Why I Won't Vax Home I Don't Trust Big Pharma Conflicts of Interest No Liability The Vaccine Inserts Inadequate Safety Testing Ingredients The Risks Outweigh The Benefit Unvaxxed are Healthier Decline in Illness Prior to Vaccines Vaccine Failure & Shedding Autism Vaccines Dont Cause Autism Vaccines Do Cause Autism Search Results Many illnesses were on the decline prior to widespread vaccination Most of us have heard that vaccines are one of the greatest medical advancements of modern history. It has been touted that vaccines have prevented more deaths in the last 50 years than any other advancement. Where does this information come from? More importantly, is it true? The erad ication of Polio is often the first example people use when discussing how essential vaccines are. Although, in the package insert for the Inactivated Polio Vaccine it states, "Prior to the introduction of inactivated poliovirus vaccines in 1955, large outbreaks of 5 poliomyelitis occurred each year in the United States (US). The annual incidence of paralytic 6 disease of 11.4 cases/ 100,000 population declined to 0.5 cases by the time oral poliovirus vaccine 7 (OPV) was introduced in 1961" , Polio peaked in 1952 with 57,879 cases and 3,145 deaths. In 1954 the number of polio cases dropped to 38,476 with 1,368 deaths. In two years polio cases dropped by 40% and deaths were down 78%. The following year a vaccine became available. One question that comes to mind for me is the question of correlation vs causation. We hear it all of the time when someone is injured after vaccination, "Correlation doesn't equal causation". So why is it that when its an adverse event we cannot determine causation, but when it is eradication of a disease we can? Is it possible that there could have been other factors contributing to the eradication of wild type poliovirus? What about other diseases that have seen dramatic declines? Polio April 1955 IPV vaccine was adopted throughout the United States Polio types 2 and 3 have been eraticated. Type one is extremely rare. We now have more cases of vaccine derived poliovirus around the world than wild strain poliovirus. Most industrialized countries use the inactivated polio virus vaccines. Since they are not "live" vaccines they do not have the risk of Vaccine-associated Paralytic Polio. However, INACTIVATED POLIOVIRUS VACCINE DOES NOT STOP TRANSMISSION OF THE VIRUS Measles Vaccine was introduced in 1963 Approximately 400-500 people died from measles complications annually when the vaccine was introduced. That same year, 5,058 people died from asthma 32,465 died from diabetes mellitus 6,330 died from ulcer of the stomach 1,533 died from falling or projected objects There was a 98% reduction of Measles deaths PRIOR to the vaccine introduction Numbers from the United States Office of Vital Statistics View More Mortality Rates Drop Prior to Vaccinations A study published in 2000 in Pediatrics researchers from the Department of Population and Family Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, The National Center for Health Statistics, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, concluded: “Thus vaccinations does not account for the impressive declines in mortality from infectious diseases seen in the first half of the twentieth century.” View More To see the listed side effects and the prelicensure safety studies check out- The Vaccine Inserts and Inadequate Safety Testing How do we explain the decline in diseases we never vaccinated against during the same time period? Contact Me Info@WhyIWon'tVax.com Submit Thanks for submitting! Home Page BACK TO TOP Vaccine Failure & Shedding

Why I Won't Vax Home I Don't Trust Big Pharma Conflicts of Interest No Liability The Vaccine Inserts Inadequate Safety Testing Ingredients The Risks Outweigh The Benefit Unvaxxed are Healthier Decline in Illness Prior to Vaccines Vaccine Failure & Shedding Autism Vaccines Dont Cause Autism Vaccines Do Cause Autism Search Results This is all a part of Big Pharma's "Sick Care Model." There are better ways to stay healthy We have become so used to taking pharmacuetical products anytime we have a pain or illness that we don't think twice about the long list of side effects these products can cause. We hear about how at the time vaccines were rolled out for covid, the data showed they were the best way out of the pandemic. But this isn't true. It never was true. Why were so many people willing to give up their careers before taking it? Because even then we knew there were other effective treatment options. Treatments with things that have been around for decades. These treatments have been given billions of times in the past and had great safety profiles. We knew even then that they were also showing to be highly effective at preventing death and hospitalizations from covid. So why take a vaccine that was rolled out in record time with very little safety data, if we have options we knew were safe and effective? It didn't make sense. Just like with the covid vaccine there are other pharmaceutical products that we take regularly that we are learning are not as safe as we were told. We are now being told that acetominophen can contribute to autism if taken while pregnant. However, a search of Pubmed shows the first study linking acetominophen to autism was done in 1996. 1996! They saw a link in 1996 and the general public did not hear about this information until 25 years later! You can find that study here. So should we continue to take vaccines when we are healthy in the hopes that they prevent us from getting sick? Ive already shown that many of these vaccines do not protect us as the side effects list the illness we are vaccinating against in many cases. You can see examples here . In cases where the vaccine does show its effective we see that while decreasing incidents of one illness we have skyrocketing numbers of chronic illnesses that go along with it. Examples of this can be found here. Do we need to prevent measles or chickenpox? Im going to give some examples of alternative ways of dealing with some of these illnesses. I will also start a section of alternative methods of treating other issues we overmedicate for like depression and methods for strengthening our immune systems and bodies as a whole. Feel free to comment below if you have anything to add. Other effective treatment options- Vaccines Welcome visitors to your site with a short, engaging introduction. Double click to edit and add your own text. Start Now BACK TO TOP

We have all been told at some point that it's important for everyone to get vaccinated in order to protect those who can't. It sounds good in theory but there are holes in this theory. Vaccine Failure, Shedding, Vaccine Derived Disease, Waning Immunity. Why I Won't Vax Home I Don't Trust Big Pharma Conflicts of Interest No Liability The Vaccine Inserts Inadequate Safety Testing Ingredients The Risks Outweigh The Benefit Unvaxxed are Healthier Decline in Illness Prior to Vaccines Vaccine Failure & Shedding Autism Vaccines Dont Cause Autism Vaccines Do Cause Autism Search Results We have all been told at some point that it's important for everyone to get vaccinated in order to protect those who can't. We are given the image of a sick, immunocompromised child and told that this child will not be able to attend school with their peers, or go out into the community unless we all get vaccinated. Only then will we reach "heard immunity", protecting the child from illness by forming a sort of cocoon of protection around them. This idea sounds great in theory. I even fell for it after having my son. I dutifully went out and got my flu shot to protect my precious new baby boy. However, there are several holes in the theory. Vaccine Failure Shedding/ Vaccine Derived Disease Waning Immunity influenza vaccine propaganda by Jeremy R. Hammond Part One: Myths and Facts about Flu Shots Part Two: How the CDC Uses Fear and Deception to Sell More Flu Vaccines Part Three: How You’re Being Lied to about the Risks of Getting a Flu Vaccine Annually Vaccine Failure View More Featured The topic of vaccine failure has become increasingly popular over the last few years. We were told that vaccines would be the only way out of the pandemic. We were told that it was a "pandemic of the unvaccinated". We were told if we got vaccinated we would not get sick and that we would be protecting others from getting sick. I think it is safe to say that none of those things are true. It has a lot of people talking about what a failure these vaccines are. People rightfully feel as though they were lied to. But vaccine failure didn't start with the coivd vaccines. An article from Medical University Vienna describes vaccine failure "There are 2 major factors responsible for vaccine failures, the first is vaccine-related such as failures in vaccine attenuation, vaccination regimes or administration. The other is host-related, of which host genetics, immune status, age, health or nutritional status can be associated with primary or secondary vaccine failures. The first describes the inability to respond to primary vaccination, the latter is characterized by a loss of protection after initial effectiveness. " The article states that, "about 2-10% of healthy individuals fail to mount antibody levels to routine vaccines." Although it varies, some diseases such as measles need 95% vaccination rates in order to reach heard immunity. That means if every person that could get vaccinated did we likely still would not reach herd immunity. Immunized People Getting Whooping Cough June 12, 2014 By Joanne Faryon / Investigative Reporter, KPBS Staff Of the 621 people who contracted the illness, 85 percent had all their preventative shots — calling into question the efficacy of the vaccine. Read More The Re-Emergence of Measles in Developed Countries: Time to Develop the Next-Generation Measles Vaccines? January 5, 2012 Gregory A. Poland, MD, MACP, Editor-in-Chief, VACCINE and Robert M. Jacobson, MD, FAAP, Professor of Pediatrics Multiple studies demonstrate that 2–10% of those immunized with two doses of measles vaccine fail to develop protective antibody levels, and that immunity can wane over time and result in infection (so-called secondary vaccine failure) when the individual is exposed to measles. In an October 2011 outbreak in Canada, over 50% of the 98 individuals had received two doses of measles vaccine. Read More United States ex rel. Krahling v. Merck & Co. August 27, 2010 Nstural News Relators Krahlillg and WlochoWBki were OOlpioyed as virologists in the Merck lub that perlOOne3000 in DTwP vaccines), linked-epitope suppression occurs. Because of linked-epitope suppression, all children who were primed by DTaP vaccines will be more susceptible to pertussis throughout their lifetimes, and there is no easy way to decrease this increased lifetime susceptibility. Read More Vaccinated child had Maine’s first case of measles in 2 years, say health officials May 21, 2019 BY JOE LAWLOR STAFF WRITER “The child is vaccinated, did not have any serious complications, and is fully recovered from the disease,” Read More The Pink Book Centers for Disease Control -From 1985 through 1988, 68% of cases in school-aged children (age 5 to 19 years) occurred among those who had been appropriately vaccinated -In 2019, 13 outbreaks of measles were reported, accounting for 663 cases; six were associated with underimmunized close-knit communities -The original Edmonston B vaccine was withdrawn in 1975 because of a relatively high frequency of fever and rash in recipients. -Approximately 2% to 7% of children who receive only 1 dose of MMR vaccine fail to respond to it, i.e., they experience primary vaccine failure. MMR vaccine failure can occur because of passive antibody in the vaccine recipient, immaturity of the immune system, damaged vaccine, or other reasons. -Most adverse events reported following MMR vaccination (such as fever and rash) are attributable to the measles component. - “During the 1989 -1991 measles resurgence, incidence rates for infants were more than twice as high as those in any other age group. The mothers of many infants who developed measles were young, and their measles immunity was most often due to vaccination rather than infection with wild virus. As a result, a smaller amount of antibody was transferred across the placenta to the fetus, compared with antibody transfer from mothers who had higher antibody titers resulting from wild-virus infection. The lower quantity of antibody [in the vaccine] resulted in immunity that waned more rapidly, making infants susceptible at a younger age than in the past.” Read More The relationship between mucosal immunity, nasopharyngeal carriage, asymptomatic transmission and the resurgence of Bordetella pertussis [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] August 25, 2017 Christopher J. Gill Pejman Rohani, Donald M Thea In conclusion, the preponderance of available evidence now suggests that the list of plausible explanations for the resurgence of pertussis in the aP vaccination era goes beyond the “poor persistence” and “waning efficacy” of these vaccines to include an additional and likely pivotal factor: “lack of sterilizing mucosal immunity”. the current burden of disease is not well explained by the disease that is observed but implies asymptomatic chains of transmission; aP vaccination, or passively acquired antibodies resulting from aP vaccination, prevents symptomatic disease in animals but does not block infections; transmission readily occurs between asymptomatic aP-vaccinated but infected animals to uninfected animals in close physical proximity; Read More Fifty-one percent of cases of patients in a 1998/1999 mumps outbreak had at least one MMR vaccination, indicating their effectiveness may be overestimated. July 1, 2005 Richard Harling, Joanne M White, Mary E Ramsay, Karen F Macsween, Corry van den Bosch The observed effectiveness of any MMR vaccination adjusted for age, sex and general practice was 69%. - Two doses of vaccine were more effective (88%) than a single dose (64%). Read More The Navy's fighting to get a rare viral mumps outbreak under control after it stranded a US warship at sea March 29, 2019 Business INSIDER Ryan Pickrell -27 sailors and Marines aboard the dock landing ship USS Fort McHenry have been diagnosed with parotitis, which the Navy described in a statement earlier this month as a "viral infection which has symptoms similar to mumps." -Viral parotitis is an infection of the saliva glands on either side of the face that's typically caused by the mumps. -“The Navy’s position is that vaccines are effective at reducing the incidence and severity of vaccine-preventable diseases,” BUMED told BI. Unfortunately, “the mumps portion of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine is the least effective of the three components, providing 88% effectiveness after completion of the two dose series” Read More Load More Shedding/Vaccine Derived Disease From MerckVaccines.com Re: Varivax (Chickenpox) Vaccine Due to the concern for transmission of vaccine virus, vaccine recipients should attempt to avoid, whenever possible, close association with susceptible high-risk individuals for up to 6 weeks following vaccination . .Vaccine recipients should avoid close contact with high-risk individuals susceptible to varicella due to possible risk of transmission . Varicella vaccine virus transmission may occur between vaccine recipients and contacts susceptible to varicella including healthy individuals. Other reported adverse reactions in all age groups include: varicella-like rash (injection site) and varicella-like rash (generalized). VARIVAX may establish latency of varicella zoster virus in immunocompetent individuals, with the potential for later development of herpes zoster. From Merck.com M-M-R® II (Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Virus Vaccine Live) Measles inclusion body encephalitis (MIBE), pneumonitis, and death as a direct consequence of disseminated measles vaccine virus infection have been reported in immunocompromised individuals inadvertently vaccinated with measles-containing vaccine. In this population, disseminated mumps and rubella vaccine virus infection have also been reported. The following adverse reactions include those identified during clinical trials or reported during post-approval use of M-M-R II vaccine or its individual components. atypical measles measles inclusion body encephalitis (MIBE) measles-like rash RotaTeq- Rotavirus Vaccine "The spread of vaccine virus to non-vaccinated contacts has been reporte d. Tell your doctor if you have someone in your household who has a weak immune system, cancer, or is taking medications that can weaken the immune system so that your doctor can provide further advice." FluMist® Quadrivalent (Influenza Vaccine Live, Intranasal) Intranasal Spray From The Insert Shedding Studies Shedding of vaccine viruses within 28 days of vaccination with FluMist was evaluated in (1) multi-center Study MI-CP129 which enrolled healthy individuals 6 through 59 months of age (N = 200); and (2) multi-center Study FM026 which enrolled healthy individuals 5 through 49 years of age (N = 344). In each study, nasal secretions were obtained daily for the first 7 days and every other day through either Day 25 and on Day 28 or through Day 28. In Study MI-CP129, individuals with a positive shedding sample at Day 25 or Day 28 were to have additional shedding samples collected every 7 days until culture negative on 2 consecutive samples. Results of these studies are presented in Table 5 Measles outbreak in a fully immunized secondary-school population T L Gustafson, A W Lievens, P A Brunell, R G Moellenberg, C M Buttery, L M Sehulster Serum samples from 1806 students at two secondary schools were obtained eight days after the onset of the first case. Only 4.1 percent of these students (74 of 1806) lacked detectable antibody to measles according to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and more than 99 percent had records of vaccination with live measles vaccine. We conclude that outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune. March 26, 1987 Read More Spotlight on measles 2010: Excretion of vaccine strain measles virus in urine and pharyngeal secretions of a child with vaccine associated febrile rash illness, Croatia, March 2010 separator commenting unavailable B Kaic1 , I Gjenero-Margan1 , B Aleraj1 , T Vilibić-Čavlek2 , M Santak3 , A Cvitković4 , T Nemeth-Blazic1 , I Ivic Hofman4 We describe excretion of measles vaccine strain Schwarz in a child who developed a febrile rash illness eight days after primary immunisation against measles, mumps and rubella. Throat swabs and urine specimens were collected on the fifth and sixth day of illness, respectively. Genotyping demonstrated measles vaccine strain Schwarz (genotype A). If measles and rubella were not under enhanced surveillance in Croatia, the case would have been either misreported as rubella or not recognised at all June 4, 2010 Read More Shedding of Infectious SARS-CoV-2 Despite Vaccination Kasen K. Riemersma, DVM, PhD1 ; Brittany E. Grogan, MPH2 ; Amanda Kita-Yarbro, MPH2 ; Peter J. Halfmann, PhD1 ; Hannah E. Segaloff, PhD3 ; Anna Kocharian, MS4 ; Kelsey R. Florek, MPH, PhD5 ; Ryan Westergaard, MD, PhD6 ; Allen Bateman, PhD5 ; Gunnar E. Jeppson, BS7 ; Yoshihiro Kawaoka, DVM, PhD1 ; David H. O’Connor, PhD8 ^; Thomas C. Friedrich, PhD1 ^; Katarina M. Grande, MPH2 ^ these results indicate that even asymptomatic, fully vaccinated people might shed infectious virus. August 21, 2021 Read More Oral polio vaccinees can continue to shed for at least 13 weeks. Stephanie B Troy, Leticia Ferreyra-Reyes, Chunhong Huang, Nadim Mahmud, Yu-Jin Lee, Sergio Canizales-Quintero, Harry Flaster, Renata Báez-Saldaña, Lourdes García-García, Yvonne Maldonado During replication, oral polio vaccine (OPV) can revert to neurovirulence and cause paralytic poliomyelitis. In individual vaccinees, it can acquire specific revertant point mutations, leading to vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP). With longer replication, OPV can mutate into vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV), which causes poliomyelitis outbreaks similar to those caused by wild poliovirus. Our real-time PCR assay was able to detect small amounts of OPV in both stool and sewage and to distinguish nonrevertant and revertant serotypes and demonstrated that OPV continues to circulate at least 13 weeks after a NID in a Mexican population routinely immunized with IPV. March 16, 2011 Read More Differentiating the wild from the attenuated during a measles outbreak Lindsay Nestibo, BN RN, Bonita E Lee, MD FRCPC MSC (Epi), Kevin Fonseca, PhD D(ABMM), Jennifer Beirnes, Marcia M Johnson, MD MHSc FRCPC, Christopher A Sikora, MD MSc MPH CCFP FRCPC In the midst of a local measles outbreak, a recently immunized child was investigated for a new-onset measles-type rash. Nucleic acid testing identified that a vaccine-type measles virus was being shed in the urine. April 1, 2012 Read More Case of vaccine-associated measles five weeks post-immunisation, British Columbia, Canada, October 2013 M Murti1 , M Krajden2 , M Petric2 , J Hiebert3 , F Hemming1 , B Hefford4 , M Bigham1 , P Van Buynder1 We describe a case of vaccine-associated measles in a two-year-old patient from British Columbia, Canada, in October 2013, who received her first dose of measles-containing vaccine 37 days prior to onset of prodromal symptoms. Identification of this delayed vaccine-associated case occurred in the context of an outbreak investigation of a measles cluster. November 15, 2013 Read More Circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 – Global update The World Health Organization In 2020, 959 human cases of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 (cVDPV2) and 411 cVDPV2-positive environmental samples were reported globally from 27 countries March 26, 2021 Read More Of the 13,749 acute flaccid paralysis cases investigated, 58.9% received at least three doses of oral polio vaccine. Hugo Kavunga Membo, Aaron Mweene, Serge Alain Sadeuh-Mba, Justin Masumu, Riziki Yogolelo, Norbert Ngendabanyikwa, Eddy Sokolua, Fred Sagamiko, Edgar Simulundu, Steve Ahuka, Jean Jacques Muyembe Of the 13,749 AFP cases investigated, 58.9% received at least three doses of oral polio vaccine (OPV), 7.3% never received OPV, while the status of 18.3% was unknown. June 22, 2016 Read More Detection of measles vaccine in the throat of a vaccinated child Florence Morfin a, Anne Beguin b 1, Bruno Lina a, Danielle Thouvenot a We report here the case of a child presenting with fever 8 days after vaccination with a measles–mumps–rubella vaccine. Measles virus was isolated in a throat swab taken 4 days after fever onset. This virus was then further genetically characterised as a vaccine-type virus. February 22, 2002 Read More Post-vaccine measles in a child with concomitant influenza, Sicily, Italy, March 2015 F Tramuto1,2 , P Dones3 , C D’Angelo4 , N Casuccio4 , F Vitale1,2 We describe the occurrence of measles in an 18 month-old patient in Sicily, Italy, in March 2015, who received the first dose of a measles-containing vaccine seven days before onset of prodromal symptoms. Measles virus infection was confirmed by PCR and detection of specific immunoglobulin; viral genotyping permitted the confirmation of a vaccine-associated illness. May 7, 2015 Read More In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP); Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Neetu Vashisht, Jacob Puliyel In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigate April 1, 2012 Read More At the present time, the only poliovirus-caused poliomyelitis cases reported in Brazil and other countries of the Americas are of vaccine etiology. L H de Oliveira, C J Struchiner At the present time, the only poliovirus-caused poliomyelitis cases reported in Brazil and other countries of the Americas are of vaccine etiology. Among individuals who had received oral polio vaccine (OPV) from 4 to 40 days before the onset of paralysis, we found a relative risk of 8.88 (95% CI: 4.37-18.03) for VAPP as compared with persons who had not been vaccinated during the same time interval. A major share of VAPP cases were related to children affected by prodromes (fever and gastrointestinal signs and/or symptoms), isolation of vaccine poliovirus type 2, paralysis of the lower limbs, and a mean age of 1 year. April 1, 2000 Read More Load More Waning Immunity "There are insufficient data to assess the rate of protection of VARIVAX against the serious complications of chickenpox in adults (eg, encephalitis, hepatitis, pneumonia), and during pregnancy (congenital varicella syndrome)." "The duration of protection from varicella infection after vaccination with VARIVAX is unknown." merckvaccines.com/varivax/ Annual Vaccination against Influenza Virus Hampers Development of Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cell Immunity in Children " long-term annual vaccination using inactivated vaccines may hamper the induction of cross-reactive CD8+ T cell responses by natural infections and thus may affect the induction of heterosubtypic immunity. This may render young childr en who have not previously been infected with an influenza virus more susceptible to infection with a pandemic influenza virus of a novel subtype ." Journal of Virology Whooping Cough Outbreak: How Effective Is the Vaccine? Widespread pertussis vaccine use at a Florida preschool failed to keep the disease away from about three dozen students, staff and family members By Cari Nierenberg , LiveScience on January 14, 2016 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN Waning Tdap Effectiveness in Adolescents Klein NP, Bartlett J, Fireman B, Baxter R. Waning Tdap Effectiveness in Adolescents. Pediatrics. 2016 Mar;137(3):e20153326. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3326. Epub 2016 Feb 5. PMID: 26908667. Routine Tdap did not prevent pertussis outbreaks. Among adolescents who have only received DTaP vaccines in childhood, Tdap provided moderate protection against pertussis during the first year and then waned rapidly so that litle protection remained 2-3 years after vaccination.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26908667/ Home Page BACK TO TOP Autism

Articles show that for decades big pharma has prioritized profits over safety. Some unethical practices they use include hiding safety studies that show the dangers of their products, bribing doctors & scientists, fraud, & unethical testing including testing their products on vulnerable populations. Why I Won't Vax Home I Don't Trust Big Pharma Conflicts of Interest No Liability The Vaccine Inserts Inadequate Safety Testing Ingredients The Risks Outweigh The Benefit Unvaxxed are Healthier Decline in Illness Prior to Vaccines Vaccine Failure & Shedding Autism Vaccines Dont Cause Autism Vaccines Do Cause Autism Search Results I Don't Trust Big Pharma A collection of articles showing that for decades the pharmaceutical industry has prioritized profits over safety. Some of the Big Pharma Corruption includes hiding safety studies that show the dangers of their products, bribing doctors and scientists, scientific fraud, and unethical testing including testing their products on vulnerable populations. Democracy Now Nigerian Attorney General Play Video pharma deception Play Video I Don't Trust Pharma Watch Now Share Whole Channel This Video Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Copy Link Link Copied Share Channel Info Close GlaxoSmithKline to Plead Guilty and Pay $3 Billion to Resolve Fraud Allegations and Failure to Report Safety Data Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in U.S. History Read More Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing Read More Johnson & Johnson to Pay More Than $2.2 Billion to Resolve Criminal and Civil Investigations Allegations Include Off-label Marketing and Kickbacks to Doctors and Pharmacists Read More Abbott Labs to Pay $1.5 Billion to Resolve Criminal & Civil Investigations of Off-label Promotion of Depakote Company Maintained Specialized Sales Force to Market Drug for Off Label Purposes; Targeted Elderly Dementia Patients in Nursing Homes Read More Eli Lilly and Company Agrees to Pay $1.415 Billion to Resolve Allegations of Off-label Promotion of Zyprexa $515 Million Criminal Fine Is Largest Individual Corporate Criminal Fine in History; Civil Settlement up to $800 Million Read More U.S. Pharmaceutical Company Merck Sharp & Dohme to Pay Nearly One Billion Dollars Over Promotion of Vioxx® Merck to Pay $950 Million for Illegal Marketing Read More Amgen Inc. Pleads Guilty to Federal Charge in Brooklyn, NY.;Pays $762 Million to Resolve Criminal Liability and False Claims Act Allegations Biotech Giant Pleads Guilty to Illegally Introducing Drug into Market for Uses That the Fda Declined to Approve; Will Pay $612 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Suits and $150 Million in Criminal Penalties and Forfeiture Amerisourceberge Read More Pharmaceutical Giant AstraZeneca to Pay $520 Million for Off-label Drug Marketing Read More Drug Maker Actelion Agrees to Pay $360 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Liability for Paying Kickbacks Read More Johnson & Johnson knew for decades that asbestos lurked in its Baby Powder Facing thousands of lawsuits alleging that its talc caused cancer, J&J insists on the safety and purity of its iconic product. But internal documents examined by Reuters show that the company's powder was sometimes tainted with carcinogenic asbestos and that J&J kept that information from regulators and the public. Read More List of largest pharmaceutical settlements Read More Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports Read More Pfizer Hit with Largest Criminal Fine in US History Read More Pfizer Has a Long History of Fraud, Corruption and Using Children as Human Guinea Pigs Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla claimed during a November 2021 interview that a small group of “medical professionals” who are intentionally circulating “misinformation” critical of the Pfizer vaccine narrative are “criminals,” but Bourla didn’t mention the criminal history of his own company. Read More Learn about how the media, our educational institutions, and our regulatory agencies are involved in Big Pharma Corruption CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Home Page BACK TO TOP Conflicts of Interest

Why I Won't Vax Home I Don't Trust Big Pharma Conflicts of Interest No Liability The Vaccine Inserts Inadequate Safety Testing Ingredients The Risks Outweigh The Benefit Unvaxxed are Healthier Decline in Illness Prior to Vaccines Vaccine Failure & Shedding Autism Vaccines Dont Cause Autism Vaccines Do Cause Autism Search Results Covid-19 Vaccines The response by public health authorities and governments around the world to the novel corona virus in 2020 and throughout the following years had devastating effects on the population. Start Now Covid Sign in Covid Play Video Share Whole Channel This Video Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Copy Link Link Copied Search video... All Categories All Categories Now Playing covid death rates austrailia and niger 00:42 Play Video Now Playing Maddie de Garay Injured in vaccine trials 00:30 Play Video Now Playing ‘Colossal_Failure’_Did_This_Just_Become_the_Worst_Public_Health 01:53 Play Video Now Playing Jessica Rose discussing vaccine ingredients 02:13 Play Video BACK TO TOP

There is no better place to find the actual risks associated with a vaccine than the vaccine insert. These are the vaccines given to our children. Starting with vaccines they are exposed to while in utero through 18 years. Why I Won't Vax Home I Don't Trust Big Pharma Conflicts of Interest No Liability The Vaccine Inserts Inadequate Safety Testing Ingredients The Risks Outweigh The Benefit Unvaxxed are Healthier Decline in Illness Prior to Vaccines Vaccine Failure & Shedding Autism Vaccines Dont Cause Autism Vaccines Do Cause Autism Search Results The Vaccine Inserts There is no better place to find the actual risks associated with a vaccine than the vaccine insert. These are the vaccines given to our children. Starting with vaccines they are exposed to while in utero through 18 years. Find Out How Vaccines Are Tested For Safety The CDC recommends that pregnant women receive TDap (Tetanus, Dihptheria, Pertussis), Influenza, and Covid 19 vaccines. They also list "other" vaccines, "Other vaccines- Some women may need other vaccines before, during, or after they become pregnant. For example, if a pregnant woman works in a lab or is traveling to a country where she may be exposed to meningococcal disease, her doctor or healthcare professional may recommend meningococcal vaccination." Hepatitis B: A baby whose mother has hepatitis B is at highest risk for becoming infected with hepatitis B during delivery. Moms, talk to your healthcare professional about getting tested for hepatitis B and whether or not you should get vaccinated. Hepatitis A: For pregnant women who have a history of chronic liver disease, doctors or healthcare professionals may recommend the hepatitis A vaccine. Vaccines for travel: Pregnant people planning international travel should talk to their doctor or healthcare professional at least 4 to 6 weeks before their trip to discuss any special precautions or necessary vaccines. See Traveler’s Health for additional tips on how to prepare to travel safe Table 1 shows the CDC vaccine schedule from birth to 18 years. You can find a full list of vaccines currently approved for use by the FDA along with the package inserts, patient information sheets, and licensing documents here VIEW ALL Hepatitis B Rotavirus DTP Haemophilus Infenzae Type B Pneumococcal Polio Influenza (IIV4) Measles, Mumps, Rubella Varicella (VAR) Hepatitis A Tetanus, Diphtheria, Pertussis Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Meningococcal Dengue Covid Hepatitis B Birth, 1-2 months, 6-18 months Recombivax-HB Click Here Engerix-B Click Here Rotavirus 2 months, 4 months, 6 months ROTARIX Click Here RotaTeq Click Here Diphtheria, Tetanus, Acellular Pertussis 2 months, 4 months, 6 months DAPTACEL Click Here PEDIARIX DTaP, hepatitis B, and inactivated poliovirus vaccine Click Here Pentacel® DTaP, inactivated poliovirus, and Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine Inactivated Poliovirus component grown in Vero cells Click Here Quadracel® DTaP and inactivated poliovirus vaccine Inactivated Poliovirus component grown in Vero cells Click Here Kinrix® DTaP and inactivated poliovirus vaccine Click Here INFANRIX Click Here Pentacel® DTaP, inactivated poliovirus, and Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine Inactivated Poliovirus component grown in MRC-5 cells Click Here Quadracel® DTaP and inactivated poliovirus vaccine Inactivated Poliovirus component grown in MRC-5 cells Click Here Vaxelis® DTaP, inactivated poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and hepatitis B vaccine Click Here Haemophilus Inflenzae Type B (Hib) 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 12-18 months ActHIB® Click Here PedvaxHIB® Click Here Hiberix® Click Here Pneumococcal 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 12-18 months Prevnar 13® Pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine Click Here Pneumovax® 23 Pneumococcal 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine Click Here Inactivated Poliovirus (IPV<18yrs) 2 months, 4 months, 6-18 months, 4-6 years IPOL® Click Here Influenza 6 months- 8 years annual vaccination of 1-2 doses, 9 years or older annual vaccination of 1 dose only Influenza Virus Vaccine, H5N1 Click Here Flucelvax Quadrivalent Click Here FluLaval Quadrivalent Click Here FluLaval Click Here Fluzone Click Here FluMist Quadrivalent Click Here AUDENZ Click Here Fluarix (3+ Years) Click Here Fluvirin (4+ years) Click Here FluLaval Click Here Fluarix Quadrivalent Click Here Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) 12-15 months, 4-6 years M-M-R-II Click Here ProQuad Package Insert - Frozen Formulation - Recombinant Human Albumin (RHA) - ProQuad Click Here ProQuad Package Insert (Frozen) - ProQuad Click Here ProQuad® Package Insert - Refrigerator-Stable Formulation - ProQuad Click Here ProQuad Package Insert - Frozen Formulation - Human SerumAlbumin (HSA) - ProQuad Click Here ProQuad Package Insert (Refrigerated) - ProQuad Click Here Varicella (VAR) 12-18 months, 4-6 years Varivax® Package Insert - Varivax (Frozen) Click Here Varivax® Package Insert - Varivax (Refrigerator) Click Here Hepatitis A (Hep A) 2 dose series 12-23 months Havrix® Click Here Vaqta® Click Here Tetanus, Diphtheria, Pertussis 1 dose during each pregnancy between weeks 27-36, one dose 11-12 years, every 10 years Adacel® Click Here Boostrix® Click Here Human Papillomavirus (HPV) If started between ages 9-14 give 2 dose series, Age 15 years and older give 3 dose series GARDASIL 9 Click Here Meningococcal 11-12 years, 16 years Menactra® Click Here MenQuadfi® Click Here Trumenba® Click Here Menveo® Click Here Bexsero® Click Here Dengue Age 9-16 years living in endemic areas and have lab confirmed previous infection Dengvaxia® Click Here Covid COMIRNATY Gray Cap Click Here Home Page BACK TO TOP Inadequate Safety Testing

So what is in vaccines? Why I Won't Vax Home I Don't Trust Big Pharma Conflicts of Interest No Liability The Vaccine Inserts Inadequate Safety Testing Ingredients The Risks Outweigh The Benefit Unvaxxed are Healthier Decline in Illness Prior to Vaccines Vaccine Failure & Shedding Autism Vaccines Dont Cause Autism Vaccines Do Cause Autism Search Results So what's in vaccines? Aborted Fetal Tissue Cells Aluminum Formaldehyde Thimerosal 2-Phenylethanol Polysorbate 80 Ingredients by vaccine & manufacturer Here I will look at some of the ingredients of vaccines. What their purpose is. Most importantly what potential adverse effects they might have on our health. Also, please watch the video below to get an inside look at how Maurice Hilleman, who is described as "one of the greatest microbiologists/ vaccinologists of all time", views the vaccine industry he helped create over six decades. View More on Maurice Hilleman Here " I think vaccines have to be considered the bargain-basement technology for the 20th century" -Maurice Hilleman What are the different types of ingredients in vaccines and what is their purpose? ADJUVANTS ANTIBIOTICS ANTIGENS INACTIVATING MATERIALS CELL CULTURE MATERIALS PRESERVATIVES STABALIZERS OTHER MATERIALS Adjuvants are ingredients put in vaccines in order to create an immune response in the body. To help keep outside germs and bacteria from growing in the vaccine. Weakened, Killed, or parts of a virus or bacteria. Added to vaccines in order to create an immune response to that specific substance. Antigens or viruses for the vaccines are grown in cell culture materials. This could be anything from eggs to human embryonic cells. Used to kill viruses or inactivate toxins Added to multi-dose vials of vaccines to prevent contamination. Added to vaccines to help the active ingredients in vaccines continue to work while the vaccine is made, stored, and moved. Stabilizers keep the active ingredients in vaccines from changing because of something like a shift in temperature where the vaccine is being stored. Residual substances not added to vaccines but left behind from the manufacturing process. Aborted Fetal Tissue Cells The use of aborted fetal tissue cells in the manufacture and production of vaccines is not uncommon. Vaccines currently in use that were developed using fetal cells include Hepatitis A, Rubella, Varicella, Zoste r, Adenovirus and Rabies. The use of fetal tissue in the production o f vaccines comes with an obvious religious issue for some but even for those who are not religious there are serious moral issues as well. Babies used are all 3 months or older gestation. In an interview published on LifeSite News for the pod cast, The John-Henry Westen Show, Pamela Acker who is an author and biologist states that “They will actually deliver these babies via cesarean section. The babies are still alive when the researchers start extracting the tissue; to the point where their heart is still beating, and they’re generally not given any anesthetic, because that would disrupt the cells that the researchers are trying to extract. So, they’re removing this tissue, all the while the baby is alive and in extreme amounts of pain. So, this makes it even more sadistic.” You'll often hear that the fetal cells used in vaccines come from two aborted babies from the 1960s, MRC-5 and WI-38. It is said or is made to sound as if these are the only two babies that were used or are used in the productions of vaccines. However, this is untrue. There are several other cell lines that have been made as backups or for research purposes. WI-38: Developed from the lung tissue of an aborted baby in 1962. The WI stands for Winstar Institute where the cell line was created, and 38 is because it was developed from the 38th fetus they used. MRC-5: Developed in 1965 from lung tissue of an aborted fetus HEK-293: From a baby aborted in 1973. HEK stands for Human Embryonic Kidney which means the cells came from the babies kidneys. This cell line was produced from the 293rd experiment done by Frank Graham. PER.C6: Produced from human embryonic retinal cells from an 18 week fetus aborted in 1985 Walvax-2: There were 9 aborted fetuses used to find the one with the best cell line to make vaccines from. The cells came from a 3 month female who was delivered in China using the "waterbag method" used to deliver the fetus intact. MRC-9: From the lungs of a female aborted in 1974 developed for research and as a back-up for vaccines. IMR-90: From the lungs of a female aborted in 1975 for research and related activities Publications that go into the details of how babies are delivered and used for research can be found here. Full deposition found here. In this clip from The Highwire you can hear Stanley Plotkin, The Godfather of Vaccines, discuss the use of aborted fetuses during a deposition by lawyer Aaron Siri. You can find the full interview here. Aluminum Aluminum Play Video Play Video Public Health Committee Public Hearing Play Video Play Video IS ALZHEIMER’S LINKED TO ALUMINUM EXPOSURE? Play Video Play Video IS ALUMINUM EXPOSURE LINKED TO AUTISM? Play Video Play Video CDC STUDY FINDS ALUMINUM IN VACCINES IS ASSOCIATED WITH ASTHMA The FDA states (a) The aluminum content of large volume parenteral (LVP) drug products used in total parenteral nutrition (TPN) therapy must not exceed 25 micrograms per liter ([micro]g/L). and must contain a warning label that reads, WARNING: This product contains aluminum that may be toxic . Aluminum may reach toxic levels with prolonged parenteral administration if kidney function is impaired. Premature neonates are particularly at risk because their kidneys are immature , and they require large amounts of calcium and phosphate solutions, which contain aluminum. Research indicates that patients with impaired kidney function, including premature neonates, who receive parenteral levels of aluminum at greater than 4 to 5 [micro]g/kg/day accumulate aluminum at levels associated with central nervous system and bone toxicity. Tissue loading may occur at even lower rates of administration. View More The math is calculated for us in 1,200 Studies - Examples of weight and corresponding maximum dose of aluminum per the FDA guidelines of 5 mcg per 2.2lb of body weight. 8lb baby = 18.16 mcg aluminum 15lb baby = 34.05 mcg aluminum 30lb toddler = 68.1 mcg aluminum 50lb child = 113 mcg aluminum 150lb adult = 340.5 mcg aluminum 350lb adult = 794.5 mcg aluminum Within hours of being born our babies are given a hepatitis B vaccine that contains 250mcg of aluminum. At 2 months old they receive another hepatitis B vaccine- 250mcg Rotavirus (RV)- 0mcg Diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis- 500mcg-1,500mcg! Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)- 0mcg-225mcg Pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13)- 125mcg Inactivated poliovirus (IPV <18 yrs)- 0mcg OR combination vaccines such as DTaP, hepatitis B, and inactivated poliovirus vaccine- 850mcg DTaP, inactivated poliovirus, and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine- 1,500mcg DTaP and inactivated poliovirus vaccine- 500mcg-1,500mcg DTaP, inactivated poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and hepatitis B vaccine- 319mcg At a MINIMUM an 8lb baby is getting approx. 14x the FDA limit of Aluminum on the first day of life, and 24x the FDA limit at 2 months old. Depending on the combination a baby can receive up to 115x the FDA limit in one day. This will be repeated at 4 months, and at 6 months. Acute exposure and chronic retention of aluminum in three vaccine schedules and effects of genetic and environmental variation Read More By Jefferey Jaxen STUDY: CDC VACCINE SCHEDULE LIKELY INDUCES ALUMINUM TOXICITY IN NEWBORNS Read More Learn more about the harms of Aluminum HERE. Formaldehyde The Center for Disease Control Describes Formaldehyde Formaldehyde (CH₂O) is a colorless, highly toxic, and flammable gas at room temperature. It is used in the production of fertilizer, paper, plywood, and some resins. It is also used as a food preservative and in household products, such as antiseptics, medicines, and cosmetics. Exposure to formaldehyde can irritate the skin, throat, lungs, and eyes. Repeated exposure to formaldehyde can possibly lead to cancer. Workers may be harmed by exposure to formaldehyde. The level of exposure depends upon the dose, duration, and work being done. See More Here A search on PubMed for "Formaldehyde adverse health effects" returned 1,124 articles Find Studies on Formaldehyde Here Vaccines that contain Formaldehyde Td (adult)/ DT DTaP (Daptacel®, Infanrix®) DTaP-Hep B IPV (Pediarix®) DTaP-IPV (Kinrix®, Quadracel®) DTaP-IPV-Hib (Pentacel®) Hepatitis A (Havrix®, Vaqta®) Hepatitis A - Hepatitis B (Twinrix®) Hib (ActHIB®, HIBERIX®) Hepatitis B (RECOMBIVAX®) Meningococcal vaccines Polio (IPOL®) Japanese encephalitis vaccine (IXIARO®) Tdap (ADACEL®, Boostrix®) Influenza Thimerosal From the FDA website, "Thimerosal, which is approximately 50% mercury by weight, has been one of the most widely used preservatives in vaccines. It is metabolized or degraded to ethylmercury and thiosalicylate. Ethylmercury is an organomercurial that should be distinguished from methylmercury, a related substance that has been the focus of considerable study. Methylmercury is the type of mercury found in certain kinds of fish. At high exposure levels methylmercury can be toxic to people. In the United States, federal guidelines keep as much methylmercury as possible out of the environment and food, but over a lifetime, everyone is exposed to some methylmercury." "Methylmercury is a highly toxic substance; a number of adverse health effects associated with exposure to it have been identified in humans and in animal studies. Most extensive are the data on neurotoxicity, particularly in developing organisms." Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended guidelines for safe intake of methylmercury. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended guidelines for safe intake of methylmercury. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended guidelines for safe intake of methylmercury. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended guidelines for safe intake of methylmercury. 1/19 The FDA states, "Thimerosal has a long record of safe and effective use in preventing bacterial and fungal contamination of vaccines, with no ill effects established other than hypersensitivity and minor local reactions at the site of injection." and that, "There is a robust body of peer-reviewed, scientific studies conducted in the United States and countries around the world that support the safety of thimerosal-containing vaccines. The scientific evidence collected over the past 15 years does not show any evidence of harm, including serious neurodevelopmental disorders, from use of thimerosal in vaccines." However, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chemical Assessment Summary shows that mercury does have developmental effects on children exposed in utero. Vaccines and Autism Play Video Politics of Thimerosal Play Video Rep Dan Burton Play Video Thimerosal Play Video Thimerosal Watch Now Share Whole Channel This Video Facebook Twitter Pinterest Tumblr Copy Link Link Copied Share Channel Info Close 1/3 The CDC says that thimerosal was removed from all childhood vaccines in 2001 . However, around the same time period they began recommending flu shots to every pregnant woman and also began giving flu shots to babies in two doses at 6 months followed by one dose annually . Not only has the safety of flu shots given during pregnancy never been established , about half of the flu shots on the market continue to use thimerosal as a preservative. The South Dakota Department of Agriculture & Natural Resources (DANR) Waste Management Program/Hazardous Waste Section,Management Guidelines for Vaccines Containing Thimerosal , describes the process for disposing vaccines that are expired or no longer usable. "State and federal hazardous waste regulations establish that any waste containing 0.2 milligrams per liter (mg/L) or more of mercury, as determined using the EPA-mandated Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) , requires management as hazardous waste "as opposed to a non-hazardous pharmaceutical waste. This document goes on to state that some vaccines labeled “ preservative- or thimerosal-free ", " may contain trace amounts (less than or equal to 1 microgram/0.5 mL dose) because thimerosal was used during the manufacturing process". So a vaccicne labeled Preservative or thimerosal free may actually contain 1 microgram of thimerosal or 0.5 micrograms of Hg. Recommended upper limit of mercury intake "The FDA has proposed 0.4 µg per kg of body weight per day as the acceptable daily intake of methyl mercury, on the basis of the threshold at which paresthesia occurs in adults (11) . However, the foetus and infants are particularly susceptible to mercury toxicity, and long-term studies in Iraq have shown language delays among infants exposed to mercury (12) . On the basis of the findings of the Iraq studies, the Environmental Protection Agency lowered its reference dose for methyl mercury exposure to 0.1 µg per kg per day." Indian Journal of Medical Ethics February 15, 2017- Robert F. Kennedy Jr announced $100,000 challenge in which Children's Health Defense would pay $100,000 to the first journalist, or other individual, who could find a peer-reviewed scientific study demonstrating that thimerosal is safe in the amounts contained in vaccines currently being administered to American children and pregnant women. The challenge was open for submissions from February 15th, 2017 until August 15th, 2017. During that six month period not one submission was made that could assure the safety of injecting thimerosal into pregnant women, infants and children. You can see a summary of the research that was submitted along with a summary response from CHD HERE . Read More About Thimerosal & Autism Here 2-Phenoxyethanol Toxicity Summary Adverse Effects 2-Phenoxyethanol (PhE) has been shown to induce hepatotoxicity, renal toxicity, and hemolysis at dosages ≥ 400 mg/kg/day in subchronic and chronic studies in multiple species. The major hazards encountered in the use and handling of 2-phenoxyethanol stem from its toxicologic properties. Toxic by all routes (inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact) , exposure to this very faintly aromatic, colorless, oily liquid may occur from its use as a fixative for cosmetics, perfumes, and soaps; as a bactericide and insect repellant; as a solvent for cellulose acetate,dyes, stamp pad, ball point, and specialty inks; as a chemical intermediate for carboxylic acid esters (eg, acrylate, maleate) and polymers (eg, formaldehyde, melamine); and as a preservative for human specimens used for dissection and demonstrations in anatomical studies. Effects resulting from exposure to this substance can include eye irritation, headache, tremors, and central nervous system depression . If contact with the eyes occurs, irrigate exposed eyes with copious amounts of tepid water for at least 15 minutes, and wash exposed skin thoroughly with soap and water. 2-Phenoxyethanol must be preheated before ignition can occur. Neurotoxin - Acute solvent syndrome Occupational hepatotoxin - Secondary hepatotoxins: the potential for toxic effect in the occupational setting is based on cases of poisoning by human ingestion or animal experimentation. Nephrotoxin - The chemical is potentially toxic to the kidneys in the occupational setting. Reproductive Toxin - A chemical that is toxic to the reproductive system , including defects in the progeny and injury to male or female reproductive function . Reproductive toxicity includes developmental effects . See Guidelines for Reproductive Toxicity Risk Assessment. Skin Sensitizer - An agent that can induce an allergic reaction in the skin. FDA Warns Consumers Against Using Mommy's Bliss Nipple Cream Product can be harmful to nursing infants Polysorbate 80 What is Polysorbate 80? Why is Polysorbate 80 in Vaccines? This description and explanation from TheDermReview.com explains Polysorbate 80 is produced by the ethoxylation of a molecule called sorbitan. Sorbitan is the dehydrated form of sorbitol, a sugar alcohol that can naturally be found in some fruits. Ethoxylation is a chemical reaction in which ethylene oxide is added to a substrate, in this case, sorbitan. Sorbitan is reacted with 80 units of ethylene oxide, which is where the 80 in polysorbate 80 comes from. Polysorbate 80 exists as a thick, water-soluble yellow liquid. Polysorbate 80 is also an emulsifier. As an emulsifier, polysorbate 80 is often used in formulations that contain both water and oil components. Mixing water and oil together creates a dispersion of oil droplets in water. However, the oil and water can separate if the product is left to settle. To address this problem, an emulsifier like polysorbate 80 can be added to help the droplets remain dispersed and so that the product remains mixed and doesn’t separate. Emulsifiers improve the consistency of a product, which enables an even distribution of the benefits of the key ingredients. Studies on the adverse effects of Polysorbate 80 According to the Material Safety Data Sheet from Merck, Polysorbate 80 seems to have very little hazards. Although, testing seems to be incomplete "Reproductive toxicity No data available Specific target organ toxicity - single exposure No data available Specific target organ toxicity - repeated exposure No data available Aspiration hazard No data available 11.2 Additional Information To the best of our knowledge, the chemical, physical, and toxicological properties have not been thoroughly investigated." Material Safety Data Sheet From 1,200 studies Vaccines that contain Polysorbate 80 DTaP (Infanrix) + aluminum DTaP IPV (Kinrix) + aluminum DTaP IPV (Quadracel) + aluminum DTaP Hep B IPV (Pediarix + aluminum DTaP IPV Hib (Pentacel) + aluminum HPV (Gardicil 9) + aluminum Influenza (Fluad) + squalene, neomycin, kanamycin Influenza (Fluarix) + b-propiolactone Influenza (Flulaval) + thimerosal Meningococcal (MenB-Tumenba) + aluminum Tdap (Boostrix) + aluminum Vaccines that contain Polysorbate 20 Hep A (Havrix) + aluminum Hep A/Hep B (Twinrix) + aluminum (2 types) Polysorbate 80 is not only found in vaccines. It serves a number of purposes and is found in many things. It is used as a surfactant in cosmetics and as an emulsifier in foods. It is also used to help drugs cross the blood brain barrier for the treatment of neurological disorders. The blood-brain barrier serves a filter, controlling which molecules can pass from the blood into the brain. Because the endothelial cells are positioned so closely together, they keep out any harmful toxins or pathogens from reaching your brain. In 1995 the first successful delivery of a drug across the blood brain barrier occurred using Polysorbate 80 to transport an anti-nociceptive peptide that cannot cross the BBB alone. This could be beneficial if your goal is to target the brain for a specific treatment. However, in the case of vaccines it can become problematic. Vaccines contain ingredients that intentionally illicit an immune response. Some of the ingredients are very toxic to the brain. While Polysorbate 80 is added to vaccines as an emulsifier it also still has the ability to not only cross the blood brain barrier but to help other substances cross the blood brain barrier as well. Home Page BACK TO TOP Risks Outweigh Benefits